ok, ok, there is avatar, 12 years after james cameron brought us titanic in 1997, another year when it was personal to me. not because there was one particular film then that i wanted to win, but because i wanted titanic in particular to lose. there, i said it. the only oscar winner in history whose screenplay wasn’t even nominated. meaning, the story sucked. there, i said it. it won solely on its technical merits.
this is just my humble opinion. here’s my problem with movies whose only advantages are technical in nature: they don’t age gracefully. i watched titanic again a few weeks ago and i didn’t find the sinking scenes as impressive as i once did. that’s because filmmaking evolves, they advance rapidly. in a few years, many of the groundbreaking techniques now will be rendered obsolete and replaced by other groundbreaking techniques. so if you watch a technically charged movie with a flat story, say, ten years from now, all you get is a boring film with tired old effects. as opposed to movies whose clear advantages are their screenplay and the actors’ performances: they become classic. you can watch casablanca then, now and in the future, it would strike you the same way it did audiences over fifty years ago. not to say movies with a lot of sfx have no potential to become classic. look at star wars. puppetronics have since been replaced by cgi and the original jabba looks somewhat amateurish by today’s standards, but its story and character development make it timeless. i’d say the same for the lord of the rings. or maybe i’m just a geek.
this time, there is a lot of talk about avatar pulling another titanic on us. a very visually engaging show with lackluster story running for best picture but nowhere in sight for best screenplay nor its actors for best performance. admittedly, the movie was stunningly beautiful… on the surface. i did like it and even recommend it to my friends (as opposed to: i discouraged my friends from watching titanic. and they hate me for it). i am quick to emphasize that the sfx will blow their socks off, but the story is meh. it’s like ferngully in another habitable planet (or was that a moon?). or reverse dances with wolves as many critics put it. i do consider it one of the best films of 2009, simply because the whole spectacle was riveting. but i couldn’t stand the idea that it might win over
inglourious basterds.
it will break me in half. sfx, no matter how magnificent, should never precede a good story. titanic has done it before to l.a. confidential. please don’t let mr. cameron do it again. i have tremendous respect for him and his craft, he is indeed a visionary director, but we just can’t let sappy stories with full-on effects get in the way of our good judgment. i like james cameron for terminator and arnold schwarzenegger, but that feels like a very distant past now.
although, for the life of me, i don’t know how a “historical fantasy” can take the plum, especially one that strikes extra-sensitive chords. especially one that takes liberties with its free rein on historical facts surcharged with moral and ethical considerations, it’s almost sacrilege. it doesn’t help that it was written and directed by quentin tarantino, of course. i think it’s about time he gets the award. he ought to win one eventually, right? what better chance to do it than for this film.
here’s another extra-juicy bite to the unfurling awards red carpet: best picture forerunner the hurt locker, touted as the most powerful movie about the war in iraq, is directed by kathryn bigelow, only the third female ever to be nominated for best director. experts surmise she might just become the first female to win a major award for that category (she has bagged the earlier awards to support that claim). she happens to be james cameron’s ex-wife. ooooohh… wouldn’t it be too succulent to have an ex-wife pull the rug from under the ex-husband’s feet? i am also rooting for you, ms. bigelow! because i love uncanny plot twists!
the second-largest awards ceremony, the golden globes, announced their picks last december 15. as we all know, this is a reliable preamble to the oscars, although there have been occasions when one and the other disagreed on best picture (like sense and sensibility won the gg, then braveheart won the oscar in 1995, yet another year when the awards was personal to me).
here are the nominees for golden globe 2010:
best picture – drama: avatar the hurt locker inglourious basterds precious up in the air
best picture – comedy or musical: (500) days of summer the hangover it’s complicated julie and julia nine
best director: james cameron – avatar kathryn bigelow – the hurt locker quentin tarantino – inglourious basterds clint eastwood – invictus jason reitman – up in the air
best screenplay: it’s complicated the hurt locker inglourious basterds up in the air district 9
best actor – drama: jeff bridges – crazy heart george clooney – up in the air colin firth – a single man morgan freeman – invictus tobey maguire – brothers
best actress – drama: emily blunt – the young victoria sandra bullock – the blind side helen mirren – the last station carey mulligan – an education gabourey sidibe – precious
best actor – comedy or musical: matt damon – the informant! daniel day-lewis – nine robert downey, jr. – sherlock holmes joseph gordon-levitt – (500) days of summer michael stuhlbarg – a serious man
best actress – comedy or musical: sandra bullock – the proposal marion cotillard – nine julia roberts – duplicity meryl streep – it’s complicated meryl streep – julie and julia
best supporting actor: matt damon – invictus woody harrelson – the messenger christopher plummer – the last station stanley tucci – the lovely bones christoph waltz – inglourious basterds
best supporting actress: penelope cruz – nine vera farmiga – up in the air anna kendrick – up in the air mo’nique – precious julianne moore – a single man
some (insignificant) comments:
a deep and resounding yesssss for christoph waltz! he has won all supporting actor trophies so far, he should get the major ones too. he is nominated for both the screen actors guild and the golden globe, he’d likely be nominated for the oscar. he is downright fantastic, he is terrifying and hilarious in parts as an ss. who would have thought someone could pull off a role like that? thank you, mr. tarantino for picking up a little-known talent from austria and giving him a big break!
i’m somewhat tired of seeing merryl streep every year among the nominees. she’s a fantastic actress, no doubt, but it seems as if they just put her in because they can’t find anyone else to fill the slot. and i don’t want her to tie katharine hepburn’s long standing record for most oscar acting awards… that’s just me.
check out, mo’nique in the highly acclaimed precious! that darn funny girl can give a darn good drama performance too!
seriously, sandra bullock? was the year really that slack for actresses in comedy? i love sandra bullock, i think she’s funny and relevant in the film industry, but her performance in the proposal isn’t so good it could warrant a nomination.
come to think of it… looks like a weak year for comedy altogether. nine gets a nod despite all the bad press and the mainstream frivolity the hangover is there with it. don’t get me wrong, there’s nothing bad about the hangover, i just thought this category was for films along the caliber of four weddings and a funeral and moulin rouge.
hey look, tobey maguire’s up for best actor. i won’t say anything for nor against it, but didn’t jeremy renner for the hurt locker give a more critically acclaimed and more talked-about performance? shouldn’t his name be up there instead?
here’s hoping too that inglourious basterds win for best ensemble cast in sag!
yes, like many of you michael jackson blokes, i turned up on the weekend of this is it and turned on the waterworks when the opening strains of man in the mirror came into play. and i sobbed through the entire song up until the end credits.
it really hurts to know what could have been.
i probably am not the best person to write a film review, what with my deeply rooted biases, so i wouldn’t even attempt to. for those of you who have loved michael jackson even a little bit growing up, and those who kept abreast of his life and times and stuck by him through his legal battles and personal ordeals, you should watch this movie. in fact, you might want to watch it twice in the cinema.
if there is any moral lesson we can gather from this production, it is speaking to people kindly even if you mean to criticize them. i asked my husband, the music and concert tour geek, if indeed michael jackson was that nice to production staff… or are they just playing up his niceness to leave a remarkable impression of saintly behavior to his fans? whatever the reality, only michael can correct a guitarist and say, “do it for love” at the end of his comment; or call out to the sound guys about ramming his inner ears then say, “i’m saying that with love, L-O-V-E.” indeed, only michael can get away with saying that.
another thing we can learn is synergy. from the dancers, the singers, the musicians, the technical staff, heck from the mind-blowing pyrotech guys, everything and everyone somehow melded into one workable unit. of course, if there had been any heated arguments or pouty walking out, the disruptions wouldn’t have made it into final production. but that wouldn’t have affected my opinion that the entire group was so synergistic and extremely supportive of each other, all teams the world over should sit up and take notes.
one of my biggest frustrations about this concert not coming into fruition, which i think i will carry until my last breath, is the fact that we won’t see michael in the fantastic costumes designed for him and the other performers, along with some classics recreated with greater intensity especially for this tour. the bedazzled gloves and socks, the iconic “thriller” red jacket embedded with fiber-optic lights that flash in time to the beat, the regimental regalia for “i just can’t stop loving you”, and what seems to be a cosmos-inspired white suit for “billie jean” heavy laden with thousands of swarovski crystals and led lights.
perhaps the most significant feeling i developed while watching this film is a tremendous respect for director kenny ortega (btw, if you don’t know who kenny ortega is, give yourself a swift kick in the butt. he worked with gene kelly in xanadu, directed and/or choreographed such classic music videos as “material girl” and movies like dirty dancing. if these titles still don’t make sense to you, here: he choreographed and directed the high school musical franchise).
while a reliable review mentioned that ortega can seem fawning and quite obsequious towards michael, i hope you also note the fact that this is michael we are talking about. even if you were not particularly supportive of his achievements and his lifestyle, you would still end up admiring the skills and story behind the man. besides, we should also remember that ortega directed both the dangerous and the history world tours, therefore he definitely knows better than any of us how to deal with michael jackson.
on a rather unrelated note: this year, kenny ortega lost two of the most talented stars he has worked extensively with: michael jackson (he directed the dangerous and history world tours) and patrick swayze (he choreographed dirty dancing and to wong foo, thanks for everything, julie newmar).
as this is it continues to shatter box office records worldwide, i can’t help but think this is not over yet.
it’s around this time of the year when i start getting more or less ambivalent about tv shows: it’s way after the mid-year stream of season debuts, just some weeks short of the holiday specials, and, naturally, the horror/thriller tv-movie genre plainly keeps me away from the small screen for hours longer than i care to allow. more importantly, it’s been some time after the finale of american idol; the revelry have quite died down, and it would still be some months until our nerves are strung on tenterhooks yet again for that shameless laugh-trip we so call the auditions.
one thing i am happy about this year is that my favorite idol contestant released a single sooner after the season than any other idol hopeful – or even winner, for that matter – in all of american idol’s short but meaningful history (of course, not counting the official a.i. song as typically released almost immediately by the winner). and to make the fortunate turn-of-events even sweeter, it’s the carrier single for a major motion picture soundtrack surcharged with all the tumultuous special effects befitting any apocalyptic film.
i am, as the title gives away, referring to adam lambert and the movie 2012 (directed by ronald emmerich, the same man who brought us independence day and the day after tomorrow; i suppose we can reasonably surmise what his favorite theme is).
true to the drama and spectacle he was known all season for, adam delivers a power ballad to further the legacy of that other end-of-the-world theme song, independence day‘s i don’t want to miss a thing. and this one will certainly do steve tyler justice.
time for miracles is, very ironically given its grand scale, a huge relief, considering the music industry has been churning out predictable tunes for the past few years. not to say that we were bereft of any potential classics. i do love my simple yet profound songs, my nonsensical dance and electronica. it’s just that we have forgotten how big, bold music with incredibly strong vocals strike our emotions as only songs with arrangements so full and so substantial can; that feeling we get from aerosmith, the kind that drag us to the ground with the mass of its power, then pull us up to a soaring crescendo as the same strength lifts our emotions to its revolutionary last notes… or eventually lay those feelings gently down from a dizzying height to a resting denouement.
love it or hate it, welcome back to the big screen the mass hysteria, the destruction and the hurtling debris from outer space. welcome back the power ballad with time for miracles:
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=euVVekys7SA&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b]
ladies and gentlemen, in just a few moments, this song will make its way to ktv bars and magic sing. please wait.
the proposal contains all the fundamental elements that make up a consummate romcom: our protagonists could not stand the very sight of each other, but an unanticipated conflict coerces them to work closely together in resolution (in the case of this film, very very closely together). throw in some old school family charm and, in no time, their charade uncovers unexpected idiosyncrasies that predictably endear them to each other. they fall in love, the end.
i like my occasional romcoms. though i am the first to lift the achtung sign when the cheesy parts are about to commence, i relish the lighthearted and lightheaded emotions that steam away deep-seated anxieties. that’s the power of kilig, no matter how unrealistic.
sandra bullock once played the slave-driven subordinate to hugh grant’s role as insensitive billionaire boss in two weeks notice, but in what must be this year’s biggest romantic comedy, she takes a jab at being the boss from hell. with an efficient but underappreciated executive assistant, andrew paxton played by ryan reynolds, bullock’s margaret tate will make you laugh as a big city girl trying to survive a family reunion in alaska.
as usual, the fashion makes the movie more memorable for me. here are the ensembles that make me love margaret tate even if she is, as gammy annie tells, “satan’s mistress”:
this now iconic proposal scene will surely go down romantic comedy history. replete with the prada handbag and christian louboutin pumps.
boating their way to the family estate. traveling in style with hermes birkin and face a face sunglasses.
insert awkward here. meeting the family in a gray mock wraparound dress (i'm crazy about the details on this one).
plaid boyfriend flannel robe over sexy negligee. rescued shelter puppy optional.
crisp classic white shirt over black pants and christian louboutins. not exactly bachelorette surprise attire, but very nice nevertheless.
as margaret feels more at home in alaska, so does her outfit. two layers of sweaters, a striped scarf and cropped pants.
antique wedding dress from gammy, pre-alterations.
much less uptight the second time around. a casual chic top with gathering detail and a slim belt.
sandra bullock with director anne fletcher. puff-sleeved top with wide stripes. my favorite.
a timeless literary classic, a fantastic computer game with old school roots, a cartoon series with a cult following, and a comic book character who deserves a movie of his own.
vicarious living couldn’t get any better than this.
1. alice in wonderland directed by tim burton
when i found out last year that my favorite fantasy story was going to be recreated on-screen by tim burton himself, i thought i was dreaming. when i found out that johnny depp is playing the mad hatter, i had to pinch myself. my cinema dream has finally come true.
does anyone know who would provide the musical score for the film? i certainly hope it’s danny elfman, the usual composer for burton films. he’s the only composer in the universe who can capture burton’s vision through music.
2. prince of persia: sands of time produced by jerry bruckheimer
from the mega-bucks producer of swashbuckling adventure epics comes another game-to-movie production in prince of persia: sands of time. the game has come a long, long way from the pixelated adventurer we have known and loved in our bulky pc’s.
jake gyllenhall plays the smoking hot title role (orlando bloom was once rumored to play it). and you have to admit, gyllenhall does look persian. wait, the prince of persia is persian, right? it’s not just a figurative nationality for his figurative title?
3. the last airbender directed by m. night shyamalan
one thing shyamalan has to be grateful for is the loyalty of his raveous fans. no matter how badly his movies are criticized, his followers would still troop to the cinemas to patronize his work. personally, i still think he is a genius. so despite the heated controversy behind the casting of the last airbender and the predictions that it will be a flop like dragonball z, i am still beyond myself with excitement to see this movie.
ok, i admit, i agree with the arguments offered by the detractors of the movie’s cast and, being asian, even sympathize with many of the fanatic haters. but please, imho, noah ringer is a dead-ringer for aang. ok, bad pun, but you know what i mean.
4. deadpool produced by lauren shuler donner and marvel
after his turn as a villainous assassin to wolverine’s hero, deadpool finally gets his solo movie. and about time! the “merc with a mouth” will bear the movie title and reports claim that the movie is going to be faithful to the comic books this time. meaning, no more weapon xi, as shown in the x-men origins. which, i suppose, means the deadpool movie will not be taking off from where wolverine left. i sure hope this is true.
ok, so we’ve seen ryan reynolds play deadpool in x-men origins and many have been convinced that he can carve a place in the comic-turned-movie genre. do you know that he is rumored to also play the title role in the green lantern movie? which means that, like his co-star halle berry, he’s another talent who gets to portray characters from marvel and dc. fanboys, please verify this rumor…
i just learned that edward cullen celebrated his birthday last june 20. i am not a twilight fan, but i try to keep abreast of the latest. and looks like there is no later entertainment fanaticism than twilight and edward cullen, what with all the parties held just to celebrate a fictitious birthday.
he turned 108 last june 20
anyway…
that suddenly got me thinking: when are the birthdays of my favorite fictitious characters? and that tiny superstitious speck in me wonders: what do their star signs say about them?
october 31
bart is a scorpio:
Scorpio people are magnetic, powerful, forceful, emotional, sexual, and psychic. Scorpios are incredibly passionate, persistent, and intense. Scorpios are often the “spiritual seekers†trying to find the right path for themselves which can be ever changing. Being naturally intuitive a Scorpio is able to easily see through lies or secrets, it’s just not easy to fool them. But their powers of secrecy for themselves are grand, mysterious, and very instinctual for them. A Scorpio doesn’t usually like you to know everything about them; they are cautious, meticulous, deliberate, and deeply emotional.
doesn’t sound like bart. does it?
depending on your sources, it is either february 17 or april 7
if bruce wayne’s birthday falls on february 17, then he would be aquarius:
Aquarians are people who are very independent, honest, rebellious, original in thought, inventive, and they are born humanitarians. They are deep analytical thinkers with definite opinions and beliefs that they enjoy sharing with others. They enjoy a good debate, and love to prove how open minded they are. Always highly intelligent and logical an Aquarian is also very serious minded. Their sense of humor is often dry or unusual. Aquarians can be loners, sometimes withdrawing themselves from the world while their sensitive side seeks true companionship.
if bruce wayne’s birthday is on april 7, then he would be an aries:
Aries people generally have a strong independent personality, they are aggressive, competitive, original, adventurous, and can be argumentative just to enjoy the debate. Aries love to do “physical” things and be active, even sometimes taking dangerous risks just to win. An Aries will always say what’s on their mind, and they will confront anyone who doesn’t treat them with respect. Aries are a lot of fun and very playful, so they enjoy being the center of attention and the life of the party. They tend to get bored easily so they need to find ways to stay active. . Aries are forward, to the point, out spoken, and have a deep desire to be in charge. Aries are natural leaders and therefore they may challenge authority figures. Often they tend to be the “heroes†or the rescuers to their friends and family.
both aquarius and aries seem to fit bruce wayne… which is a better fit though?
march 9
barbie is a pisces:
Pisces people are born with the gift of prophecy and with all the right things in place, they are deeply spiritual people. Pisces is known for compassion, sensitivity, patience, romance, imagination, and natural intuition. A Pisces is very imaginative and loves to just be alone with thoughts or their fantasy world. Many have some type of spiritual awakening; a moment of enlightenment, in their life. A Pisces can be literally inspiring to others and will even sacrifice their own desires to support a loved one. Being so emotionally sensitive, it is easy at times for a Pisces to seek escape through over indulgence.
barbie, spiritual?? hyeah, right. over indulgence is more like it.
depending on your sources, winnie-the-pooh is either august 21 or october 14
if winnie-the-pooh’s birthday is on august 21, he would be a leo:
Leos are larger than life because they attract others easily and are strong, generous, passionate, and hard workers. A Leo has a zest for life, ambition, and have a very sharp wit. Leos are natural leaders, they want to do it all their own way without help, just to prove to themselves that they can. They are cheerful, fun, pleasant, and stand out among a crowd that gives them plenty of attention. They are powerful personalities and call attention to their greatness. A Leo needs to be noticed for their abilities, and if you do then you’ll for sure have a great friend. Leos are good at heart, creative, fun loving, and have a fierce ambition to succeed in anything they do.
if winnie-the-pooh’s birthday is on october 14, he would be a libra:
Librans love beauty, creativity, and balance. Libras are wonderful writers and communicators because their wit and charm shine through their words. Libras are analytical thinkers that weigh both sides to every issue, sometimes spending far more time then is needed. A Libra is friendly, lovable, social, sensual, charming, intellectual, and dramatic. They are born to flirt, which in most cases is just harmless fun and a part of their natural “sparkleâ€. Libras look for the positives in life, because it is prettier than a negative. A Libra tends to try and please everyone needing to always feel “likedâ€, accepted, and understood.
pooh seems like a libra to me.
anyway, just a few days ago, june 18, was clark kent’s “birthday”. well, the day he landed on earth, at least. no one knows when he was born on krypton. he was adopted by the kents on june 25. so happy birthday, superman! yep, i think you can pwn edward cullen (ok, fangirls, you can hate me now).
all zodiac personality traits are lifted from http://www.mistichouse.com/zodiac/.
stepping out of the cinema on the premier night of x-men origins: wolverine, it suddenly occured to me to ask my husband about his preference: marvel or d.c.? he said he doesn’t take sides on that one.
d.c. vs. marvel. would you like to pick a side?
well, i lean towards d.c.. but that’s just me. not to say that i don’t like characters outside of the d.c. universe, but if i had to choose just one over the other, my choice is very clear. but, of course, there are other publishers, other remarkable characters which are worth more than your two cents in comic book conversations. and don’t forget manga and their die-hard fanboys.
so with that train of thought starting my morning today, i decided to post some of the lists i have collected, counting down the greatest comic book characters of all time. many just enumerate the top ten, others go as far as two hundred. for this blog’s mediocre purpose, let’s just stick to the top ten or twenty of some of these “hallowed” lists.
empire magazine’s greatest comic book characters of all time (top 20 of 50):
this, i found, had the most favorable comments from fanboys and readers. their biggest beef about it is merely the ranking of batman and superman (who they think should trade places in the 1 and 2 spots). other than that, there is pretty much a general consensus to it, notably to the fact that the entire list includes both mainstream and indie characters.
check it out, vote and join the forum! many readers think this guy should have been higher on the list.
i think this is the best-presented list online. brief trivia and write-ups about artists, costumes, t.v. and movie franchises make it the most informative and, by far, the most interesting. plus you get to vote whether you think a particular character should be higher or lower on the list. how fun is that?
discovery channel’s top ten comic book heroes of all time:
disclaimer: i am jotting this one down from memory. although i remember all ten characters very clearly,  i am completely sure of the position of only the first four. thus, i refuse to rank characters from five onwards.Â
judge dredd the hulk wonder woman witchblade akira tintin
i'm glad this guy made it to the list! go, snowy, go!
the list says heroes, not characters. i suppose that explains the absence of villains like the joker. i am also happy that they recognize akira and tintin, both outside the popular comic-turned-blockbuster movie field.
wizard magazine’s greatest comic book characters of all time (top 20 of 200):
as opposed to empire magazine, this list received the least favorable reactions from fanboys and readers, many of them succumbing to low-down profanities and shameless insults to describe the writers of wizard. they object to wolverine ranking the highest, many of them claiming no surprise if either superman, batman or spider-man took top honors; but wolverine? does this mean the magazine is losing its credibility?
shadowcat over this amazon princess? what do you think?
i may not be as well-informed as the rest of the “commenters”, but i would have to say putting logan above everybody else is a very short-sighted move. plus kitty pryde!? higher than wonder woman!? d.c. fanship aside… honestly? will wonders never cease.
bigsmudge.com’s top comic book characters (top 20 of 100):
SPOILER ALERT! for deadpool fans who love his ascerbic wit and comic awareness, they might be disappointed that he has been "silenced" by stryker in the movie, stitching his lips together.
taken mostly from online votes, no surprise here that most of these names come from extremely successful t.v. and movie franchises. but i’m quite happy to see deadpool and bane make it that high on the list. i’m just a little surprised why superman is beneath the top 5, heck, even lower than 10. could it be because many alpha readers don’t appreciate how his character and story were developed in smallville? just wondering.
as for me, taking everything into consideration (readership, longevity, t.v. and film, hobby shop presence, lunch box appearances, adam west in leotards, etc.), the batman tops my list. and to all the listmakers: seriously, no comedian??
how about you, who are your greatest comic book characters of all time?
there are these cloying hypothetical statements that go “if i had one million dollars, i would…”, which never fail to turn on the boredom in me. one million dollars is such an unchallenging number to fit your imagination into. first off, it’s a huge amount, so it enables you to rattle off just about everything you reasonably desire (shoes, clothes, jewelry, car, house, anything) and still have spare change left.
so to make us really think, let’s make the amount in consideration only php300,000.00.  that’s right, only three hundred thou of our good ol’ philippine pesos. if you had the chance to just waste all that money on stuff, what would you buy?
i would spend the money on:
this marc jacobs bag
www.marcjacobs.com
 a pair of stella luna pumps
animal print, pointed, gold heels. the bitchiest you can find.
a visa and eventually round trip tickets to japan
japan in spring
and since i’ll be traveling, a set of rimowa topas luggages including the cabin trolley and beauty case in this color
rimowa topas luggages in gold
then i’d still have enough left to buy my husband this collection of james bond dvd’s
james bond limited edition 40-dvd collection in attache case
 this sony ericsson xperia x1
techie dreams are made of
for my little girl, more books for her little touch leap pad
little touch leap pad from leapfrog educational toys
and all the polvoron she can get her hands on.
what would you buy with three hundred thousand pesos?
marc jacobs boutique in greenbelt 4; stella luna shoe stores in power plant, shangri-la and soon in glorietta 4; rimowa store in greenbelt 5;Â Â leapfrog educational toys available in all leading toy stores; if anyone knows where we can find the james bond dvd collection in the limited edition attache case around here, please tell my husband. please.
Enter your email address:
Delivered by FeedBurner
Subscribe to i am shallow
